USING MICROORGANISMS FOR TREATING CHROMIUM- AND NICKEL-CONTAMINATED WASTEWATER IN THE V©N CHµNG CRAFT-SETTLEMENT, NAM §ÞNH

L¹i THÚY HIÒN1, TRÇN §×NH MÊN1, §ç THU PH­¬NG1,
V­¬NG THÞ NGA1, NGUYÔN §×NH ViÖT1, LÊ THÞ LÀI2

1Institute of Biotechnology, NCST; 2Institute of Geology, NCST,
18 Hoàng Quèc ViÖt, CÇu GiÊy, Hà Néi, ViÖt Nam.

Abstract: Nowadays, the application of microorganisms for removing dissolved metals from contaminated wastewater is relatively new throughout the world. For low running cost and simplicity of their operation, the microbial processes have been considerably interested now. Based on the results of characteristics and capability of removing heavy metal of indigenous microorganisms isolated from V©n Chàng wastewater, we set up 50 and 100 liter models in Vân Chàng for minimizing chromium (Cr) and nickel (Ni) by sulfate-reducing bacteria (SRB). After one-month treatment, the concentration of metals was greatly reduced: Cr from 165 mg/l to 0.375 mg/l (99.77%), Ni from 485 mg/l to 5.2 mg/l (98.9%). The results have been showing high efficiency in removing Cr and Ni and prospect for expanding large-scale treatment in Vân Chàng and other places.

I. INTRODUCTION

Chromium and nickel are widely used in metallurgical, electroplate industry and metal equipment production. Wastewater from such industries contains a considerable amount of soluble Cr and Ni, that causes harmful effect to the human health. Cr is commonly found in two inorganic chemical forms in natural environment, Cr3+ (chromide) and (chromate). Cr4+ is very toxic at any dose, causing diseases, such as nervous, digestion disorder, breathing disorder, liver cancer… Persons contacting usually with Ni can easily get hepatitis, nephritis, bronchitis, pneumonia…

Microbial treatment technology returns mobile and toxic contaminants to their stable immobile mineral forms. For instances, Cr and Ni, Zn and Cu, Pb and Fe are removed to form hydroxide, carbonate, sulfide, respectively. In anaerobic condition SRB can decompose organic compound using SO42- as terminal electron acceptor producing H2S. It reacts with dissolved metal to sulfide precipitation form (1), (2)

2CH2O + SO42- ® H2S + 2HCO3 - (1)

H2S + M2+ ® MS¯ + 2H+ (M: metal) (2)

Sottnik and Sucha (1999) successfully carried out the field test in the Sobov, Slovakia for acid mine drainage remediation by passive treatment system. After treatment, the content of dissolved elements significantly reduced: Fe from 2260 to 4.1 mg/l, Al from 900 to 0.18 mg/l, Mn from 51 to 23 mg/l, Cu from 4.95 to 0.03 mg/l. Upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) was used effectively by Yang (Korea, 2002) in copper treatment. Zaluski and Canty [16] confirmed the ability of SRB in heavy metal removal, especially reducing Cr6+ to Cr3+, a much less toxic form of chromium according to the following reaction:

3 HS- + 6FeSO4 + 4CrO42- + 13H2O + OH- ® 3So + 6Fe(OH)3 + 4Cr(OH)3 + 6SO42-

V©n Chàng is a well-known village as mechanical and plating equiment production. Large amount of heavy metal contaminated wastewater is drained directly into V©n Chàng river without treatment, causing seriously water pollution.

To demonstrate the efficiency of treating Cr and Ni-containing wastewater by SRB in V©n Chàng, four Cr and Ni models set up according to UASB are presented in this paper.

II. MATERIALS AND METHOD

1. Materials

* Cr- and Ni - contaminated water and mud samples collected from different places in Vân Chàng village, Nam Định.

* The composition and role of substrate and additives in experimental modelling include:

- Straw, sawdust, cobbles, mineral constituting stable substrate for bacterial growth

- Cow shit served as organic carbon source for bacterial growth.

- Crushed limestone providing buffering capacity to increase the pH

* Culture media (g/l):

Desulfobulbus: Na2SO4 3, KH2PO4 0.2, NH4Cl 0.3, NaCl 1, KCl 0.5, MgCl2 O.4, CaCl2.2H2O 0.15, FeSO4.7H2O 0.5, yeast extract 1, vitamins 1, trace element 0.1, water up to 1 liter, pH 7.2-7.4.

Desulfovibrio: KH2PO4 0.5, NH4Cl 1, NaCl 1, CaSO4 1, MgSO4.7H2O 2, sodium lactate 3.5, FeSO4.7H2O 0.5, yeast extract 1, vitamins 0.1, trace elements 0.1, water up to 1 liter, pH 7.2-7.4.

Thiobacillus ferooxidans: KH2PO4 0.2, (NH4)2SO4 0.3, KCl 1, Ca(NO3)2 0.02, MgSO4 1, FeSO4 1, water up to 1 liter, pH 3.5-4.0 .

Thiobacillus thiooxidans: Na2S2O3.5H2O 5, KH2PO4 3, NH4Cl 0.1, CaCl2 0.25, MgCl2 0.1, water up to 1 liter, pH 3.

Thiobacillus thioparus: Na2S2O3. 5H2O 5, NaHCO3 1, Na2HPO4 0.2, MgCl2 0.1, NH4Cl 0.1, FeSO4 trace, water up to 1 liter, pH 7.4-8.5.

2. Method

* Morphology of bacteria and the heavy metal inside the cells are observed by optical microscope Laboval 4 (Germany) and electron microscope JEM 1010 (Japan).

* Assessing the growth of heavy metal removal bacteria by most probable number method (MPN)

* Setting up 50 and 100 liter models for removing Cr and Ni in V©n Chàng settlement according to the principle of UASB.

* Concentration of Cr and Ni is analyzed by photometry

III. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

By using SRB that have ability to remove dissolved metals isolated from V©n Chàng wastewater, 4 Cr and 3 Ni models were set up in V©n Chàng according to UASB principle.

* Composition of substrate and additived in the model include:

Cow shit and bacteria 3%, straw 1.5%, sawdust 1.5%, cobbles 2%, crushed limestone 2%

* Operating process of Cr and Ni models

First two weeks keep static stage for bacterial growth. After that effluent wastewater was added with 1/10 volume and take out the same volume during the operation process. The samples that operate for a long time, add cow shit after 4 weeks and material after 6-8 weeks in order to maintain stable activity of the model with pH = 6-7, Eh –100 mV.

1. Chromium model

4 Cr models (three 50 liter models and one 100 liter model) were set up in V©n Chàng with the ratio of inlet wastewater from 10 well water : 1 Cr contaminated water)

a. CrII-50l model (16/9/02)

Table 1. Bacteria number, pH and Eh in CrII-50l model

Date

Exp. time (week)

Bacteria number

pH

Eh (mV)

Dv

Db

NO3

Tp

Tt

Tf

16/9/02

0

102

102

106

0

101

101

5.9

224

3/7/02

2

106

105

105

0

<101

<101

5.93

-135

17/7/02

4

106

106

105

0

101

<101

6.02

-120

10/8/02

7

106

107

104

0

<101

<101

6.62

-109

26/8/02

9

107

105

103

<101

<101

<101

6.57

-167

Table 2. Concentration of elements in CrII-50l model

Tank

Inlet

Outlet

Standard TCVN 5945- 1995
B level

Time (week)

0

2

4

12

Cr (mg/l)

260

12.2

5.3

1.4

1

Ni (mg/l)

2.96

1.6

0.15

 

1

The results (Table 1, 2) have been indicating that the model is effective for Cr removal after 12 week operation. With 102 CFU/ml of SRB that are supported in inlet, Cr concentration greatly reduced from 260 mg/l to 1.4 mg/l (99.46%).

b. CrIV-100l model (10/9/02)

Table 3. Bacteria number, pH and Eh in CrIV-100l model

Date

Exp. time

(week)

Bacteria number

pH

Eh (mV)

Dv

Db

NO3

Tp

Tt

Tf

16/9/02

0

104

103

104

<101

3.101

<102

5.25

225

3/7/02

2

107

107

106

<101

<102

<102

5.83

-108

17/7/02

4

1010

108

104

0

<101

<102

5.92

-171

10/8/02

6

107

107

104

0

<101

102

6,57

-164

26/8/02

8

106

105

103

0

<101

<101

6,44

-140

Table 4. Concentration of elements in CrIV-100l model

Tank

Inlet

Outlet

Standard TCVN 5945- 1995
B level

Time (week)

0

2

4

8

Cr (mg/l)

165

24.0

16.5

0.375

1

Ni (mg/l)

6.0

0.924

0.43

 

1

Cu (mg/l)

2.5

0.036

 

 

1

Zn (mg/l)

3.0

0.12

 

 

2

Fig. 1. Chromium wastewater treatment model Fig. 2. Coriander before and after treatment

Results of CrIV-100l scale in tables 3, 4 showed that number of SRB is highest up to 1010 CFU/ml after 4 week- treatment. Cr concentration significantly reduced from 165 mg/l to 0.375 mg/l (90%) after 8 week- operation

2. Nickel model

3 Ni models (two 50 liter models and one 100 liter model) were set up in V©n Chàng with the ratio of inlet wastewater from 6 well water: 1 Ni contaminated water).

a. NiII-50l model (26/10/02)

After first two weeks of static stage, SRB from 102 CFU/ml were up to 107 CFU/ml and highest were 108-109 CFU/ml after 4 week-operation. Ni concentration was decreased after 2 static culture weeks. After two week-operation with the addition of 1/10 volume inlet wastewater and taking out the same volume, Ni concentration reduced 96,7% (Tables 5,6).

Table 5. Bacteria number, pH and Eh in NiII-50l

Date

Exp. time

(week)

Bacteria number

pH

Eh (mV)

Dv

Db

NO3

Tp

Tt

Tf

26/10/02

0

102

102

106

0

102

0

7.53

18

7/11/02

2

107

106

105

0

101

101

6.38

-131

27/11/02

4

109

108

105

0

102

<101

6.62

-158

30/12/02

8

106

106

104

0

101

101

6.73

-93

Table 6. Concentration of elements in NiII-50l

Tank

Inlet

Outlet

Standard TCVN 5945- 1995

B level

Time (week)

0

2

4

Ni (mg/l)

200

36.5

6.5

1

Cr (mg/l)

1.28

0.05

 

1

Fe (mg/l)

43

14.0

15.0

5

Mn (mg/l)

1.36

0.5

 

1

SO42- (mg/l)

340.3

33.0

 

 

NH4+ (mg/l)

34

 

 

 

b. NiIII-100l model (10/8/02)

105 CFU/ml of SRB was added to the inlet water. After two static weeks, SRB were highly grown up to 1010 CFU/ml; pH = 6,2 - 7,3; Eh was always in minus (-193 mV) (Table 7). Ni concentration was considered as decreased 98,8% after two static weeks. After two week-operation with 1/10 volume of inlet wastewater and taking out the same volume, Ni concentration reduced 99% (Table 8).

Outlet wastewater is treated continually by aquatic plants such as water hyacinth, coriander. Consequently, the heavy metals reach the B level of Vietnamese standard for industrial wastewater, (TCVN 5945-1995).

Fig.1. Nickel waswater treatment model Fig.2. Coriander before and after treatment

Table 7. Bacteria number, pH and Eh in NiIII-100l model

Date

Exp. time

(week)

Bacteria number

pH

Eh (mV)

Dv

Db

NO3

Tp

Tt

Tf

10/8/02

0

105

105

106

0

0

0

7,32

238

26/8/02

2

1010

109

106

<101

<101

<101

5,81

-193

10/9/02

4

1011

109

106

3x101

3x101

<101

6,25

-93

26/9/02

6

108

108

105

3x101

3x101

<101

6,28

-69

25/10/02

8

109

105

104

0

0

0

6,50

-69

7/11/02

12

109

105

103

0

5x101

0

6,55

-142

IV. CONCLUSION

Results of Cr and Ni models have been indicating that the indigenous SRB play certain role in the treatment of metal containing wastewater. After one-month treatment, the concentration of metals is greatly reduced: Cr from 165 mg/l to 0.375 mg/l (99.77%), Ni from 485 mg/l to 5.2 mg/l (98.9%).

Treated water reaches the B level of the Vietnamese standard for industrial wastewater (TCVN 5945-1995).

V. ACKNOWLEDGMENT

This paper is a part of the VNM 00/004 Project, which has been supported by the International Bureau of the Ministry of Education and Research in Germany.

The authors would like to thank BMBF, Department of Sciences, Technology and Environment, Nam §Þnh province, the administrative authorities of V©n Chàng village, Nam Giang commune, Nam §Þnh province, Department of Mineral Deposit, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Commenius University, Bratislava, Slovakia and Department of Petroleum Microbiology, Institute of Biotechnology, Hà Nội, Việt Nam.

REFERENCES

  1. Bigham J. M., Schwertmann U., Pfab G., 1996. Influence of pH on mineral special in bioreactor stimulating acid - mine drainage. Applied Geochemistry, 11: 845 - 849.
  2. Brierley CL., 1990. Bioremediation of Metal-contaminated Surface and Groundwater. Geomicrobiol. J., 8: 201-223.
  3. Drovak D. H., Medin R. S., Edenborn H. M., and Mantire R. E., 1991. Treatment of metal contaminated water using Sulfate-reducing bacteria: results from pilot-scale reactors. In: Proc. of the 1991 Nat. Meeting of the Amer. Soc. of Sulfate Mining and Reclamation, Princeton, pp: 241-248.
  4. Eaton A. D., L. S. Clesseri, and A. E. Greenberg (ed.), 1995. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. Amer. Public Health Assoc., Washington, D.C., p. 368-370
  5. Fujita M., M. Ike., 2003. Laboratory-scale continuous reactor for soluble selenium removal using selenate-reducing bacterium, Bacillus sp. SF-1. Ann. Rep. of water sci. and envir. Biotechn., Osaka Univ. 14: 66-71.
  6. Hien L. T, K. Q. Hoa, L. T. Binh, L. T. Lai, 2000. Preliminary results on isolation and characterization of Thiobacillus from V©n Chàng wastewater. Intern. workshop on envir. protection community health for sustain. dev. of craft-settlements in Nam §Þnh, pp: 87-94.
  7. Kashiwa M., M. Ike., 2003. Removal of soluble selenium by a selenate-reducing bacterium Bacillus sp. SF-1. Ann. Rep. of water sci. and envir. Biotechn., Osaka Univ.. 14:3-7.
  8. Lai L. T., J. Kasbohm, J. Eidam, 2000. Assessment of environmental pollution of metal processing villages of Nam Giang (Nam §Þnh). J. of Earth Sci., 22(2): 140-145.
  9. Machemer S. D., and Wildeman T. R., 1992. Adsorption compared with sulfide precipitation as metal removal processes from acid mine drainage in a constructed wetland. J. of contaminant hydr., 9: 115-131.
  10. Plumer S. M., Updegraff D. M., and Wildeman I. R., 1991. Sulfate reduction versus methanogenesis in substrates designed to treat acid mine drainage: 201st Nat. meeting, Amer. Chem. Soc.
  11. Sucha V., Kraus I., Zlocha M., Stresko V., Gasparovikova M., Lintneriva. Uhlik P., 1997. Prejavy a priciny acidiifikacie v obkasti Sobova (Stiavnicke vrchy), Mineralia Slovaca, 29: 407 - 416.
  12. Wildeman T. R., 1998. Biogeochemical principles. Dept. of Chem. and Geoch. Colorado School of Mine, pp: 1-14.
  13. Wildeman T. R., Updegraff D. M., 1997. Passive Bioremediation of Metals and Inorganic Contaminants. In Perspectives in Envir. Chem., Oxford, 473 - 495.
  14. Wildeman T. R., Updergraff D. M., Reynolds J. S., and Bolis S.L., 1994. Passive bioremediation of metals from water using reactors or constructed wetlands. Emerging Techn. for Biorem. of metals, Lewis Publ., Bocaraton, Florida.
  15. Yang J. W., Kim S. J., 2002. Application of Brewery UASB Granules to Treatment of Acidic Industrial Wastewater containing Heavy Metals. First ASEM Conf. on Biorem., Hanoi, Vietnam, Sept. 24-27.
  16. Zaluski M., M. Canty, J. Trudnowski, 2000. Application of Sulfate-reducing bacteria for passive remediation of water contaminated with metals. MSE Tech. Appl., Inc. 200 Technology Way, Butte, Montana 59701, USA