DELINEATING THE BOUNDARY
BETWEEN FRESH AND BRACKISH GROUNDWATER IN
NGUYỄN
TRỌNG VŨ1, TĂNG Đ̀NH NAM2, ANDREAS
WELLER3
1Institute of
Geophysics, VAST, 18 Hoàng Quốc Việt, Hà Nội.
2Institute of Geology and Mineral Resources, Thanh Xuân, Hà Nội
3Institute of Geophysics, Clausthal University of Technology,
Germany,
Arnold-Sommerfeld-Str. 1, D-38678
Abstract: Saltwater intrusion into aquifers is a serious
problem for coastal areas where a huge amount of water is extracted. To study
the problem of saltwater intrusion, the knowledge of the boundary between fresh
and brackish groundwater is of fundamental interest. Using the results of 30
vertical electrical soundings, five electromagnetic profiles measured by very
low frequency method and additional measurements of the electrical conductivity
of water in wells, this paper presents the geological structure of
water-bearing formations and delineates the boundary between fresh and brackish
groundwater in Giao Thuỷ and Xuân Trường districts of Nam
Định Province. The study indicates that an apparent resistivity
value of 50 Wm represents the limit between fresh and brackish
groundwater-bearing formations.
I. OVERVIEW
II. METHODOLOGY
1. Vertical electric sounding
In order to achieve the
objective of the study, a network of vertical electric sounding (VES) was used
to investigate the coastal area in Xuân Trường and Giao Thuỷ
districts. VES method is usually applied to determine the layered structure of
a more or less horizontally stratified subsurface. The theoretical fundamentals
of VES method are summarized in geophysical textbooks e.g. [1]. The method uses
two electrodes (A and B) to feed a low frequency current into the ground. Two
other electrodes (M and N) are used to measure the voltage difference. The
depth of penetration depends on the spacing between the electrodes. The used
Schlumberger configuration is characterized by a small distance between the
electrodes M and N and a larger spacing between the outer pair of current
electrodes A and B. The two pairs of electrodes are placed along a line
symmetrically with regard to a common point of reference O which indicates the
station of the VES. The apparent resistivity ra of
the subsurface can be calculated by the formula.
(1)
with DU being
the voltage between the electrodes M and N, I the injected current, and K
the configuration factor which depends on the distances between all the
electrodes A, B, M, and N.
2. Very low frequency (VLF) profiling
The VLF instrument used for
this project is the WADI, manufactured by ABEM Instruments, AB,
III. HYDROGEOLOGICAL SITUATION
In
An aquifuge containing
marine sediments (mQ13bvp) and alluvial-marine sediments (amQ13bvp) consisting mainly of clay and clayey
sands covers the Pleistocene aquifer. The Holocene aquifer is found above that
aquifuge. It can be divided into the Lower Holocene (qh1) aquifer
and Upper Holocene (qh2) aquifer. The Lower Holocene aquifer is a
confined aquifer which consists of fine-grained sand and clayey sand sediments.
The Upper Holocene aquifer is an unconfined aquifer consisting of sandy clay
and clay sediments. The geological unit Q21-2hh2 is inserted between the
Lower and Upper Holocene aquifers as an aquifuge. Most Holocene aquifers
contain brackish water [5,6].
IV. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
1. Area of investigation
According to Đoàn
Văn Cánh et al. [3] and Nguyễn Văn Độ et al. [6],
brackish water is intruded in almost all Holocene aquifers. For the Pleistocene
aquifer, freshwater lenses only exist in Hải Hậu, Nghĩa
Hưng and part of Giao Thuỷ and Xuân Trường districts. It
can be concluded that the boundary between fresh and brackish water is located
in Giao Thuỷ and Xuân Trường Districts. Therefore in this
study, geophysical surveys were carried out in Giao Thuỷ and Xuân
Trường Districts (Fig. 1).

Figure 1. VES stations and
VLF profiles in the area of investigation.
2. Data acquisition and interpretation
To separate the geological
structures in the area of investigation, 30 VES were performed using
Schlumberger configuration with the electrode spacing AB reaching up to 800 m.
A current transmitter made in Việt
To delineate the boundary
between fresh and brackish water, five sections with a total length of 16 km of
VLF profiles were measured. The distance of measured points along the profiles
was 20 m. Along VLF profiles, the electrical
conductivity of groundwater was also measured with a distance of sample
collection of approximately 500 m. All VES stations and VLF profiles were shown
in the map of the area of investigation (Fig. 1).
Generally, the VES curves
can be separated into two curve types: one is measured in fresh groundwater
area while the other is measured in brackish groundwater area. VES curves can
be interpreted using
Considering the value of
apparent resistivity of the investigated geological structures, fresh
groundwater can be found at a depth of more than 70 m in the area of VES
stations D21, D20, and D30. The values of apparent resistivity reach around 100
Wm in this part of the
section (red color in Fig. 2a) which corresponds to the Pleistocene aquifer.
The other part of this profile exhibits brackish groundwater with apparent
resistivity values below 50 Wm. For the Holocene aquifer, there is only an area around VES station D22
with an apparent resistivity of 80 Wm which might be caused by a fresh groundwater
filling. Brackish groundwater should be assumed in the Holocene aquifer from
the center to the end of the profile. The resistivity survey confirms that most
of the Holocene aquifer is filled with brackish groundwater.

Figure 2. (a)
Distribution of apparent resistivity (pseudo cross-section) along a profile
across Xuân Trường district; (b) Resistivity cross-section compiling
the 1D inversion results of several VES stations.
VLF data were acquired at
five profiles (see Fig. 1). Fig. 3 shows a filtered curve of VLF data
corresponding to a depth of 60 m from VES station D30 to VES station D27. The
first section of this profiles from 0 to 1700 m is
located on a fresh groundwater area. The VLF value at this section only is
±10%. The section from 1700 m to the end of the profile is characterized be
values of up to three times higher compared with first section (±30%). From the
VLF data, we can conclude that the boundary between fresh and brackish
groundwater is located at position 1700 m of the profile.
Along the VLF profile, the
electrical conductivity of water in groundwater wells is determined. The depth
of the wells is about 100 m. The measured values of electrical conductivity of
groundwater sw along the profile are compiled in the graph of Fig.
4 that shows a good agreement with the VLF data in Fig. 3. The boundary between
fresh and brackish water is well resolved by both surveys.

Figure 3. Filtered data of VLF profile in
Xuân Trường district.

Figure 4. Electrical conductivity along VLF profile in Xuân Trường
district.
Another profile is
investigated from Quất Lâm to Ngô Đồng town of

Figure 5. (a) Apparent resistivity
distribution along profile from Quất Lâm to
Ngô Đồng, Giao Thuỷ dictrict; (b) Resistivity cross-section
compiling the 1D inversion results of several VES stations.
The apparent resistivity
measured with an electrode spacing between A and B of
100 m corresponds to an approximate depth of penetration of 12 m [7]. This
spacing is chosen to represent the apparent resistivity of the Holocene
aquifer. Fig. 6 shows the distribution of the apparent resistivity measured
with this spacing in the whole area of investigation. Using the resulting map,
the areas where fresh groundwater can be exploited from the aquifer are
identified by apparent resistivity values larger than 50 Wm.

Figure 6. Apparent resistivity distribution
at a depth of 12 m (AB = 100 m).
The apparent resistivity of
the Pleistocene aquifer shown on Fig. 7 is represented by the values measured
with an electrode spacing AB of 800 m. Fresh groundwater was found only in
areas of the aquifer where the apparent resistivity value exceeds 50 Wm. The dotted line in Fig. 7 marks the boundary
between fresh and brackish groundwater. Fresh groundwater can be exploited in
areas indicated by yellow to red color while the brackish groundwater is
expected in areas of green to yellow colors.

Figure 7. Apparent
resistivity distribution at depth of 100 m (AB = 800 m).
V. CONCLUSIONS
Since the formation
resistivity is to a large extend influenced by the water salinity, fresh and brackish
water-bearing formations can well be separated by geoelectrical methods.
Vertical electrical soundings and VLF profiling have proven to be appropriate
tools to delineate the boundary between fresh and brackish groundwater.
VES provides the layered
structure beneath the sounding station. A single VES enables the identification
of the depth sequence of aquifers and aquifuges. Several aquifers can be
investigated in one survey. A profile or a map of the results of a network of
VES stations provides useful information on the distribution of fresh and
brackish water in both the Holocene and Pleistocene aquifers. The study has
shown that even the apparent resistivity measured with a certain spacing that
corresponds to the depth of the aquifer can be used to identify fresh water
zones. In the
area of investigation, an apparent resistivity value of 50 Wm has proven to be an appropriate choice to separate fresh and brackish
groundwater-bearing formations.
VLF is only sensitive to a single
depth interval. The boundary between fresh and brackish water in the
Pleistocene aquifer could be well resolved by VLF profiling. The electrical
conductivity data of water samples acquired at wells along the same profile
confirmed the VLF results.
Acknowledgements
We
would like to thank Dr. Lê Thị Lài (
REFERENCES
1.
Burger
H. R., Sheehan A. F., Jones C. H., 2006. Introduction to Applied Geophysics: Exploring
the shallow subsurface. W. W. Norton
& Company, Inc.
2.
Đào
Huy Quư, Lê Đức Ngân and Đào Mạnh Tường, 2005. Water problems in the
strategy for socio-economic development of
3.
Đoàn
Văn Cánh, Lê Thị Lài, Hoàng Văn Hưng,
Nguyễn Đức Rỡi, Nguyễn Văn Nghĩa, 2005. Groundwater potential of
4.
Hydrogeological Division of
5.
Lê Thị
Lài, Đoàn Văn Cánh, Nguyễn Đức Rỡi, Phạm Thái Nam, Phạm Quư Nhân, Nguyễn Đức B́nh, Nguyễn
Văn Nghĩa, 2004. Report of project: ”Groundwater
potential investigation and proposal the sustainable exploiting for
6.
Nguyễn
Văn Độ, Tạ Đức Bốn, Đỗ Văn Quốc, Bùi
Minh Đức, 1996. Report on hydrogeological mapping for
7.
Roy A.
and Apparao A., 1971. Depth of investigation in direct current methods. Geophysics, 36 : 943-959.