MODEL
BASED MONITORING OF COD
IN INDUSTRIAL WASTE-WATER NETWORKS
S. SCHLUETER,
TH. WACK
Fraunhofer
Institute for Environmental, Safety
and Energy Technology UMSICHT,
Osterfelder
Straße 3, D-46047
Email: stefan.schlueter@umsicht.fraunhofer.de
Abstract: A method for planning, monitoring and control of COD values in industrial
waste-water networks is presented, which can be used to avoid unwanted COD
peaks in specified points of a waste-water net (e.g. the inlet of a treatment
plant). The idea is to treat a volume of waste-water as a package, which is travelling
through the network from a source to the next nodal point, and a computer
program is used to record this travel. Conservation requirements for pipes,
nodes and reservoirs are used to build up a comparatively simple mathematical
toolset for modelling time dependent COD and volume levels in the pipe network.
Results for a waste-water network in an industrial area in
I. INTRODUCTION
For efficient controlling
of COD in industrial waster water treatment plants it is necessary to get rough
information about the time distribution of incoming waste-water and incoming COD
charge. In contrast to municipal treatment plants waste-water in industrial
areas is discharged with a highly dynamic time distribution due to the dynamic
operation of plants and waste-water discharge in the production processes operated
by the business units in the area. Incoming COD charge depends mainly on the
time distribution and mass of discharged waste-water from every unit in the industrial
area, on the network topology, and on the size of internal reservoirs in the
network. To avoid exceeding COD limits in the inlet of the waste-water
treatment plant it is a good idea to monitor COD at selected points of the
network and balancing COD peaks with internally available reservoirs. Model
based computation of flow and mixing processes in the network should be added
to achieve a highly efficient plant operation. The simulation method discussed
here is comparatively simple and can be established with low effort.
II. METHOD
To achieve an efficient
operation of the treatment plant, the waste-water network is divided into
discharger, pipes, reservoirs, nodes and control elements (pumps, valves, etc.).
The classical approach is to set up the conservation equations for impulse,
overall mass, component mass and energy in every point of the network and to solve
the resulting equation system with numerical methods. This procedure results in
mass flow, component concentration and temperature inside the network (see for
example [1-3]). Several modern plant simulation tools are available worldwide,
mainly for simulation of stationary operation points. Simulation of transient
operation is difficult due to complexity of physical parameters, discrete types
of flow events, numerical problems and excessive large computation times.
In industrial waste-water
networks the discrete type of flow events is a main problem for classical
simulation. Due to discharging from discontinuous operated processes a large
amount of the network topology is empty most of the time and flow events occurring
like packages of waste, which are send through the network. The modelling
method mentioned here pick up this type of event and try to follow the ‘waste
packages’ through the network from node to node up to the next reservoir.
III. MODEL SETUP
The system consists of
-
waste-water
pipes,
-
nodes and ducts,
-
reservoirs
(sampling and clearing pools),
-
control
equipment (pumps, valves),
-
discharger
sources (production units).
The mathematical model
should describe
-
the volume flow
and
-
the COD
concentration (or the COD load)
in
the considered branches of the network as a function of time. Additional it is
possible to achieve the temperature distribution in the network as a function
of time by implementing energy balances. By doing this one should be clear,
that also mostly COD-free discharges like washing water must be taken into
consideration to get correct temperature information. This effort must be
checked against the advantages of having knowledge about temperature dependencies
in the network flow.
A static time grid is
chosen as a discrete scheme for numerical stability reasons. Due to the
numerical robustness this method has high advantages over classic numerical integration
methods via time step control. The following Figures 1 to 3 give an impression
of the approach.
First (see Fig. 1) the discharge
of a specific waste-water volume (grey element) from a source in a pipe at
time
is illustrated. The
discharged waste-water ‘package’ is characterized by its volume, its COD
concentration and its temperature.

Figure 1. Discharge
of a waste-water ‘package’ at the time ![]()
In the following time step
the considered volume
element has travelled a distance through the pipe given by its flow velocity;
simultaneously a second volume element is discharged in the pipe from the same
source (see Fig. 2).

Figure 2. Discharge
and flow at the time ![]()
The volume element considered
in Fig. 1 gets to the end of the pipe at time
and is added to the
reservoir (see Fig. 3). Simultaneously other volume elements are discharged
from the source and travelling through the pipe.

Figure 3. Element
discharged at
arriving the next
reservoir at the time ![]()
It’s an important
assumption of our approach, that every pipe in the network has a characteristic
constant hold-up time
for all volume elements. Waste-water is sent in discrete
packages through the pipe and other physical effects e.g. diffusion or back mixing
are not taken into consideration. Depending on the network topology the
reservoir illustrated in Fig. 3 can also be a pipe node (this is a reservoir
with zero volume). In Figures 1 to 3 also a volume element discharged and travelling
from the reservoir is illustrated. This happens simultaneously with the discharge
from the upstream source, and the reservoir is treated as a discharge source as
mentioned above with a specific COD and temperature given by simple conservation
requirements.
The reflection given above
for a single discharger/pipe/reservoir element is done simultaneously for all
elements in the network topology, which is only easy computer work also for bigger
networks. A second important simplification can be the assumption, that the
hold-up time
is equal for all pipes
and equal to the computing time step
. This means, that all volume elements discharged from a
source, reservoir or node are travelling to the next node exactly within a
single computation step
. This simplification makes the simultaneous computing of
elements more easy, but it is not essential for the approach and must be
verified for specific cases.
For the given model
elements pipe, node, reservoir and pump the following equations results from
conservation requirements:
Pipe
Node
Reservoir
![]()
Pumps
As mentioned above, in many
cases the computing step can be set equal to the pipe hold-up time:
The mean pipe hold-up time depends
from the volume flow and the pipe topology and can be considered from channel hydraulic
calculations (see [3]). Example given: for a channel with diameter 300 mm and a
hydraulic incline of 0.8 % at volume flows above 5 m3/h the
hold-up time will be in the range of 2-3 minutes for a pipe length of 100 m.
IV.
CHARACTERIZATION OF DISCHARGE
In most cases gauging
equipment for recording waster water volume and quality will be not available
for every industrial production company located in an industrial area. Anyway
information for simulation of the network can be achieved by collecting information
about the production processes and their waste-water fluxes, and combining them
in specific periodical event diagrams for every source. It is useful to
distinguish between
-
base load
discharges, lasting for longer times, and
-
peak load
discharge events, lasting only a limited amount of time.
Peak loads set up on the
base load and establish a family of periodical functions, from which a sequence
of events can be constructed. Fig. 4 illustrates how to describe the time dependent
discharge function of a source by summing up a base load and two periodical
peak load events.

Figure 4. Combining base load and two periodical peak
loads to a discharge function
Periodical peak loads can
be statistically distributed in the considered time interval, if no relevant information
can be achieved on the exact point in time of specific events. With the method
mentioned here events (e.g. the cleaning of a production vessel) can be
characterized by three time constants:
1.
Duration of
discharge,
2.
Period of this
event,
3.
Offset of event
start against a reference point.
The waste-water discharged
must be characterized by volume, COD and temperature. For the base load mean
values over the day can be specified. Several minor events with low peak loads
can be summarized within the base load.
V. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS
The model given in Section
3 can be implemented for example in Microsoft Excel. The waste-water network
topology of a large industrial company with about 20 production facilities
located in a German industrial area was set up and the necessary data collected
per interviews. The results show a very good agreement for COD values and volume
levels in reservoirs and for periodical COD peaks in the mean reservoir, from
which waste-water has been discharged to the on-site preflooder.
The agreement in
temperature course was not sufficient, which emphasize the coverage of toilet and
cleaning water and other COD-free sources to get a right temperature answer
from the model. The simulation tool now is an essential component in the company’s
strategy to minimise its waste-water taxes, which not only depends on the
overall amount of discharge but also strongly on the high of COD peak events.
REFERENCES
1. Hager W.H., 1994. Abwasserhydraulik. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
2. Idelchik I.E., Steinberg
M.O. (Ed.), 1994. Handbook of Hydraulic Resistance. CRC Press,
3. Lingireddi S., Ormsbee L.E., Wood D.J. and
Ramalingam D., 2005. Design of
Water Distribution Systems; in: Water Encyclopedia – Municipal Water Supply; John Wiley & Sons,