MODEL BASED MONITORING OF COD
IN INDUSTRIAL WASTE-WATER NETWORKS

S. SCHLUETER, TH. WACK

Fraunhofer Institute for Environmental, Safety
and Energy Technology UMSICHT,
Oberhausen
Osterfelder Straße 3, D-46047 Oberhausen, Germany
E
mail: stefan.schlueter@umsicht.fraunhofer.de

Abstract: A method for planning, monitoring and control of COD values in industrial waste-water networks is presented, which can be used to avoid unwanted COD peaks in specified points of a waste-water net (e.g. the inlet of a treatment plant). The idea is to treat a volume of waste-water as a package, which is travelling through the network from a source to the next nodal point, and a computer program is used to record this travel. Conservation requirements for pipes, nodes and reservoirs are used to build up a comparatively simple mathematical toolset for modelling time dependent COD and volume levels in the pipe network. Results for a waste-water network in an industrial area in Germany show good agreement with measurements at fast computation times.


I. INTRODUCTION

For efficient controlling of COD in industrial waster water treatment plants it is necessary to get rough information about the time distribution of incoming waste-water and incoming COD charge. In contrast to municipal treatment plants waste-water in industrial areas is discharged with a highly dynamic time distribution due to the dynamic operation of plants and waste-water discharge in the production processes operated by the business units in the area. Incoming COD charge depends mainly on the time distribution and mass of discharged waste-water from every unit in the industrial area, on the network topology, and on the size of internal reservoirs in the network. To avoid exceeding COD limits in the inlet of the waste-water treatment plant it is a good idea to monitor COD at selected points of the network and balancing COD peaks with internally available reservoirs. Model based computation of flow and mixing processes in the network should be added to achieve a highly efficient plant operation. The simulation method discussed here is comparatively simple and can be established with low effort.

II. METHOD

To achieve an efficient operation of the treatment plant, the waste-water network is divided into discharger, pipes, reservoirs, nodes and control elements (pumps, valves, etc.). The classical approach is to set up the conservation equations for impulse, overall mass, component mass and energy in every point of the network and to solve the resulting equation system with numerical methods. This procedure results in mass flow, component concentration and temperature inside the network (see for example [1-3]). Several modern plant simulation tools are available worldwide, mainly for simulation of stationary operation points. Simulation of transient operation is difficult due to complexity of physical parameters, discrete types of flow events, numerical problems and excessive large computation times.

In industrial waste-water networks the discrete type of flow events is a main problem for classical simulation. Due to discharging from discontinuous operated processes a large amount of the network topology is empty most of the time and flow events occurring like packages of waste, which are send through the network. The modelling method mentioned here pick up this type of event and try to follow the ‘waste packages’ through the network from node to node up to the next reservoir.

III. MODEL SETUP

The system consists of

-        waste-water pipes,

-        nodes and ducts,

-        reservoirs (sampling and clearing pools),

-        control equipment (pumps, valves),

-        discharger sources (production units).

The mathematical model should describe

-        the volume flow and

-          the COD concentration (or the COD load)

in the considered branches of the network as a function of time. Additional it is possible to achieve the temperature distribution in the network as a function of time by implementing energy balances. By doing this one should be clear, that also mostly COD-free discharges like washing water must be taken into consideration to get correct temperature information. This effort must be checked against the advantages of having knowledge about temperature dependencies in the network flow.

A static time grid is chosen as a discrete scheme for numerical stability reasons. Due to the numerical robustness this method has high advantages over classic numerical integration methods via time step control. The following Figures 1 to 3 give an impression of the approach.

First (see Fig. 1) the discharge of a specific waste-water volume (grey element) from a source in a pipe at time   is illustrated. The discharged waste-water ‘package’ is characterized by its volume, its COD concentration and its temperature.

Figure 1. Discharge of a waste-water ‘package’ at the time

In the following time step  the considered volume element has travelled a distance through the pipe given by its flow velocity; simultaneously a second volume element is discharged in the pipe from the same source (see Fig. 2).

 

Figure 2. Discharge and flow at the time

The volume element considered in Fig. 1 gets to the end of the pipe at time  and is added to the reservoir (see Fig. 3). Simultaneously other volume elements are discharged from the source and travelling through the pipe.

 

Figure 3. Element discharged at  arriving the next reservoir at the time

It’s an important assumption of our approach, that every pipe in the network has a characteristic constant hold-up time for all volume elements. Waste-water is sent in discrete packages through the pipe and other physical effects e.g. diffusion or back mixing are not taken into consideration. Depending on the network topology the reservoir illustrated in Fig. 3 can also be a pipe node (this is a reservoir with zero volume). In Figures 1 to 3 also a volume element discharged and travelling from the reservoir is illustrated. This happens simultaneously with the discharge from the upstream source, and the reservoir is treated as a discharge source as mentioned above with a specific COD and temperature given by simple conservation requirements.

The reflection given above for a single discharger/pipe/reservoir element is done simultaneously for all elements in the network topology, which is only easy computer work also for bigger networks. A second important simplification can be the assumption, that the hold-up time  is equal for all pipes and equal to the computing time step . This means, that all volume elements discharged from a source, reservoir or node are travelling to the next node exactly within a single computation step . This simplification makes the simultaneous computing of elements more easy, but it is not essential for the approach and must be verified for specific cases.

For the given model elements pipe, node, reservoir and pump the following equations results from conservation requirements:

Pipe

                           

                

Node

                           

    

Reservoir

                                                   

   

                    

Pumps

 

As mentioned above, in many cases the computing step can be set equal to the pipe hold-up time:

                                             

The mean pipe hold-up time depends from the volume flow and the pipe topology and can be considered from channel hydraulic calculations (see [3]). Example given: for a channel with diameter 300 mm and a hydraulic incline of 0.8 % at volume flows above 5 m3/h the hold-up time will be in the range of 2-3 minutes for a pipe length of 100 m.

IV. CHARACTERIZATION OF DISCHARGE

In most cases gauging equipment for recording waster water volume and quality will be not available for every industrial production company located in an industrial area. Anyway information for simulation of the network can be achieved by collecting information about the production processes and their waste-water fluxes, and combining them in specific periodical event diagrams for every source. It is useful to distinguish between

-        base load discharges, lasting for longer times, and

-        peak load discharge events, lasting only a limited amount of time.

Peak loads set up on the base load and establish a family of periodical functions, from which a sequence of events can be constructed. Fig. 4 illustrates how to describe the time dependent discharge function of a source by summing up a base load and two periodical peak load events.


Figure 4. Combining base load and two periodical peak loads to a discharge function


Periodical peak loads can be statistically distributed in the considered time interval, if no relevant information can be achieved on the exact point in time of specific events. With the method mentioned here events (e.g. the cleaning of a production vessel) can be characterized by three time constants:

1.    Duration of discharge,

2.    Period of this event,

3.    Offset of event start against a reference point.

The waste-water discharged must be characterized by volume, COD and temperature. For the base load mean values over the day can be specified. Several minor events with low peak loads can be summarized within the base load.

V. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

The model given in Section 3 can be implemented for example in Microsoft Excel. The waste-water network topology of a large industrial company with about 20 production facilities located in a German industrial area was set up and the necessary data collected per interviews. The results show a very good agreement for COD values and volume levels in reservoirs and for periodical COD peaks in the mean reservoir, from which waste-water has been discharged to the on-site preflooder.

The agreement in temperature course was not sufficient, which emphasize the coverage of toilet and cleaning water and other COD-free sources to get a right temperature answer from the model. The simulation tool now is an essential component in the company’s strategy to minimise its waste-water taxes, which not only depends on the overall amount of discharge but also strongly on the high of COD peak events.

REFERENCES

1. Hager W.H., 1994. Abwasserhydrau­lik. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.

2. Idelchik I.E., Steinberg M.O. (Ed.), 1994. Handbook of Hydraulic Resistance. CRC Press, Boston.

3. Lingireddi S., Ormsbee L.E., Wood D.J. and Ramalingam D., 2005. Design of Water Distribution Systems; in: Water Encyclopedia – Municipal Water Supply; John Wiley & Sons, New York.